This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background Exertional desaturation in interstitial lung disease (ILD) is conventionally reduced to one value, usually nadir peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) or walked distance. Continuous pulse oximetry now permits second-by-second characterisation of oxygenation and pulse-rate (PR) kinetics. We compared kinetic and conventional metrics during the six-minute walk test (6MWT) and one-minute sit-to-stand test (1STST) in ILD. Methods In this cross-sectional, single-centre analysis within the European ILD Registry (eurILDreg), 163 adults completed both tests on one day with continuous 1-Hz SpO 2 and PR recording. Panel time-series models estimated desaturation, recovery and PR slopes. Analyses were stratified by catheter-confirmed pulmonary hypertension (PH) and related to the GAP index. Results The 1STST desaturated 1.7-fold faster than the 6MWT (−0.022 versus −0.013%SpO 2 ·s −1 ) and loaded the circulation 9.7-fold faster (0.305 versus 0.031 bpm·s −1 ). Nadir SpO 2 was nevertheless lower during the 6MWT (86.9% versus 91.1%); after the 1STST it fell a further 24 s. Cross-test agreement was moderate for nadir SpO 2 (r=0.42), strong for peak PR (r=0.71). DLCO outperformed FVC for every significant endpoint, slope-based metrics most strongly (r up to 0.62), and was the dominant independent predictor after adjustment. PH (n=22) approximately doubled the 6MWT desaturation rate (−0.0220 versus −0.0111%·s −1 , p<0.001); the 1STST separated these patients only weakly. Desaturation slope steepened across GAP stages (p<0.001), yet GAP explained only 11% of its variance. Conclusions The 6MWT and 1STST impose distinct, complementary loads and are not interchangeable. Oximetry-derived slopes capture diffusion-driven gas-exchange failure more sensitively than amplitude-based endpoints and add information beyond established severity indices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krauss et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: