For a linear subspace S of Mm×n(C), we define L(S) = Span{AB† : A, B in S} and R(S) = Span{A†B : A, B in S}, and study the extremal equality dim L(S) = dim R(S) = dim S. The central result is a rank-compression principle: if S is a singular 2-plane of maximal rank r, the extremal conditions force S to be unitarily equivalent to a subspace contained in M_r(C) ⊕ 0ₙ₋ᵣ. This compression reduces the classification to the regular cases of lower dimension.As an application, we obtain the complete orbit classification of extremal 2-planes for every n. The regular branch is classified by its invariants (p, [t], [u]) modulo block exchange, and the singular branch by the same invariants applied to the maximal-rank block r after compression. In particular, in the singular branch there is rigidity at maximal rank 2 and a continuous family of orbits from maximal rank 3 onwards, and the singular branch of M_4(C) is the first where a continuous family of non-TRO orbits appears.We extend the classification to the case of extremal 3-planes in M_3(C): every solution is regular and unitarily equivalent to a subspace of diagonal matrices, and the singular branch of M_3(C) is empty. Commutativity, on the other hand, is not preserved under bilateral unitary equivalence, as shown by the cyclic 3-plane Span{E_12, E_23, E_31}.Diagonalizability of the regular branch is universal for d ≤ 3, but the TRO property is not guaranteed by the extremal equality. For d ≥ 4, the existence of a non-diagonalizable extremal 4-plane shows that diagonalizability ceases to be universal. These results delimit precisely the boundary between rigidity and bifurcation in spaces of matrices, for every dimension n.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
JOSÉ TORREGROSA JIMÉNEZ (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: