Caseous lymphadenitis is a chronic infectious disease of sheep and goats caused by Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis , with major implications for animal health, farm productivity, carcass value, and occupational exposure risk. Because infected animals may remain clinically inapparent or develop chronic lesions, practical field-based screening tools are needed to improve early detection and herd-level disease management. This study evaluated whether multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis could differentiate healthy/control goats from CL-positive goats using resistance, reactance, phase angle, and derived spectral features. Measurements were summarized across 50, 100, and 180 kHz, followed by multivariate visualization, Mahalanobis distance analysis, leave-one-subject-out validation, animal-level risk ranking, calibration assessment, and decision curve analysis. CL-positive goats showed distinct frequency-dependent impedance behavior, including altered resistance-reactance profiles and consistently higher phase angle responses across frequencies. Multivariate spectral distance from the healthy centroid was significantly greater in CL-positive animals, suggesting measurable bioelectrical deviation from the healthy impedance profile. A nonlinear model outperformed the linear model in leave-one-subject-out ROC analysis, with an AUC of 0.68 compared with 0.56, indicating moderate discrimination from raw impedance measurements. Animal-level risk ranking further showed enrichment of CL-positive goats among higher predicted-risk animals, while decision curve analysis suggested potential screening value at lower clinical threshold probabilities. These findings support the feasibility of BIA as a rapid, non-invasive adjunct screening tool for CL-associated risk classification in goats. From a One Health perspective, this approach may improve animal welfare, reduce disease persistence in small-ruminant systems, support producer decision-making, and decrease human exposure risk linked to infected animals and contaminated farm environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siddique et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: