Key result
Greater resilience is linked to better quality of life in cardiovascular patients, mediated by lifestyle.
Why the study?
The mediating role of lifestyle in the relationship between resilience and quality of life in cardiovascular patients was not well understood.
Cross-Sectional (n=303)
Yes
In cardiovascular patients, resilience and a healthy lifestyle are positively associated with quality of life, with lifestyle mediating the effect of resilience.
Introduction: Cardiovascular disease, as a chronic and debilitating physical condition, is one of the most common causes of mortality. This study aimed to investigate the mediating role of lifestyle in the relationship between resilience and quality of life in cardiovascular patients.Method: The present study was a descriptive-correlational and structural equation. The statistical population of the present study includes all cardiovascular patientsreferring to cardiovascular hospitals in Tehran in 2019, of which 303 people were selected as the sample by the purposed sampling method. Data collection tools included the qualityof life,health-promoting lifestyle profile, and Connor Davidson resilience scale.Results: The results showed there is a significant positive relationship between lifestyle with quality of life in patients with heart disease. Resilience had a positive relationship with quality of life. Lifestyle also played a mediating role in resilience to quality of life (P<0.01).Conclusion: Based on this, in the field of designing the necessary measures to improve the quality of life in cardiovascular patients, it is possible to develop programs to strengthen resilience and a healthy lifestyle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamalinedjad et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease (n=303). Resilience and lifestyle was evaluated on Quality of life (p=<0.01). Resilience had a positive relationship with quality of life in cardiovascular patients, with lifestyle playing a significant mediating role (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: