This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Translation inhibitors are invaluable for probing ribosome function and therapeutic applications, but systematic discovery in human systems is limited by the lack of scalable, screening-compatible cell-free platforms. Here, we establish a robust high-throughput screening using human lysates that bypasses cellular cytotoxic effects. After screening ~28,000 small molecules, we identified known and a novel translation inhibitor, including NT-2, a trichothecene mycotoxin produced by the pathogenic Fusarium sporotrichioides. NT-2 suppressed protein synthesis in human cells and yeast lysates, while sparing translation in bacteria and intact yeast cells. Cryo-EM at 1.76 Å revealed NT-2 bound at the peptidyl transferase center of the human 60S ribosome. In addition, cryoEM classification of NT-2 treated cells shows ribosomes in an inactive eEF2/SERBP1-bound dormant state. Together, these results expose NT-2 as a previously unrecognized environmental inhibitor of mammalian protein synthesis and demonstrate the power of cell-free translation screening to reveal new inhibitors with unexpected ribosome fates.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“You can imagine the cell's protein factories being switched into a sleep mode from which they can no longer wake up on their own. Our observations could explain why certain environmental toxins or medications leave long-term traces in cells.”
“By reducing the cells to their essentials, so to speak, we can examine very precisely whether a substance directly influences human protein production. Thanks to our new method, we can investigate the effects of environmental toxins and potential active compounds on one of life's most fundamental biological processes, namely protein production, with much greater precision than before.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schwaller et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: