Key result
Concurrent and aerobic training both improved hemodynamic and functional biomechanics in men with coronary artery disease, with significant improvements in functional capacity and diastolic BP (P≤0.05).
Why the study?
The effects of various types of cardiac rehabilitation exercise on hemodynamic and biomechanical indices in middle-aged versus older male adults with coronary artery disease were unclear.
Does concurrent exercise training compared to aerobic training improve hemodynamic and biomechanical indices in middle-aged and older males with coronary artery disease?
RCT (n=32)
randomly
Does concurrent exercise training compared to aerobic training improve hemodynamic and biomechanical indices in middle-aged and older males with coronary artery disease?
Both aerobic and concurrent training improve hemodynamic and functional biomechanics in men with CAD, with concurrent training showing broader benefits including improvements in LVEF and resting heart rate.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Concurrent training offers broader hemodynamic gains than aerobic alone in CAD rehab; extends evidence for optimizing exercise prescriptions in cardiac rehabilitation.
Introduction: Although it is documented that cardiac rehabilitation has a positive effect on hemodynamics and functional biomechanics of the heart, the effect of various types of exercise in this field, in different periods of life such as middle-aged and older male adults, is thought-provoking. This study was undertaken to compare cardiac rehabilitation training on selected hemodynamic and biomechanical indices between middle-aged and older male adults with coronary artery disease following a cardiac event or therapeutic interventions. Materials and Methods: Thirty two middle-aged and older male adults with coronary artery disease were randomly and equally divided into two aerobic and concurrent exercise groups. With the permission of a cardiologist in the imaging center, the exercise test was performed in the pre-test stage. After eight weeks of cardiac rehabilitation training in the biomechanics laboratory of the physical medicine center, the post-test phase was performed. To analyze the data from mean and standard deviation, one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc test was utilized to check differences between groups at the significant level of P≤0.05. Results: After eight weeks of aerobic training, a significant difference was observed in the improvement of functional capacity and diastolic blood pressure (P≤0.05) between the middle-aged and older male adults groups, but not for left ventricular ejection fraction indices, resting heart rate and systolic blood pressure (P>0.05). Followed by concurrent training as well, a significant difference was observed in the improvement of functional capacity indices, left ventricular ejection fraction, resting heart rate, and diastolic blood pressure (P≤0.05), but not for index of systolic blood pressure was not observed (P>0.05). Conclusion: The results of the research confirmed the effectiveness of both types of aerobic and concurrent training in improving hemodynamic and functional biomechanics of the heart. In the comparison between middle-aged and older male adults, the effect of aerobic exercise on the older male adults and the effect of concurrent exercise on the middle-aged can be considered more prominent. It seems that the priority of using concurrent training over aerobic training can be taken into consideration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amiri et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease following a cardiac event or therapeutic interventions (n=32). Concurrent training vs. Aerobic training was evaluated on Hemodynamic and biomechanical indices (functional capacity, left ventricular ejection fraction, resting heart rate, and blood pressure) (p=≤0.05). Concurrent and aerobic training both improved hemodynamic and functional biomechanics in men with coronary artery disease, with significant improvements in functional capacity and diastolic BP (P≤0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: