Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aims This study examines soil CO₂-flux responses to micro-environmental temperature and aims to clarify microclimatic controls over soil CO₂-emission dynamics in northern forested swamps. Location: Forested swamps in Laojieji Forest Farm of the Zhangguangcai Range, northern China. Methods Five forest-swamp types were investigated. Soil CO₂ fluxes were monitored at 10-day intervals from May 2023 to May 2024 using the static dark-chamber gas-chromatography method, together with synchronous observations of soil properties and micro-environmental temperature. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test was used to compare CO₂-emission patterns and statistically examine inter-community differences in soil physicochemical and micro-climatic parameters. Scatter-plot fitting and backward stepwise multivariate regression based on multi-window antecedent-temperature indices were adopted for unraveling driving mechanisms and microclimate feedbacks. Results Annual mean soil CO₂ fluxes ranged 122.09–235.18 mg·m − 2 ·h − 1 , with growing-season fluxes of 234.21–469.99 mg·m − 2 ·h − 1 and non-growing-season fluxes of 51.07–77.57 mg·m − 2 ·h − 1 . Shrub swamps produced the highest CO₂ efflux and alder swamps the lowest. Most communities showed bimodal intra-annual flux dynamics, while silver-birch swamp followed a unimodal pattern peaking in June–July (G > C > L ≈ B > M). Significant inter-type differences existed in daily maximum and accumulated micro-environmental temperatures, but not in daily mean and minimum temperatures. Scatter-plot fitting revealed positive trends between all antecedent-temperature metrics and soil CO₂ efflux; mean and accumulated temperatures yielded stronger fitting performance (R 2 > 0.7). One-day antecedent air temperature dominated annual-scale flux variation, and temperature-CO₂ coupling displayed pronounced seasonal and community-specific divergence. Conclusion Soil CO₂ efflux shows scale-dependent lagged response to antecedent micro-environmental air temperature. Both the coupling strength and optimal lag-window are modulated by seasonal thermal regimes and plant-community properties: strong short-term lag coupling occurs under freeze–thaw cold conditions, while such coupling breaks down in warm summer periods; in addition, optimal thermal lag responses differ across swamp communities within the growing season.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: