This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Unlike traditional virtual impactors, which suffer from a fixed level of small particle contamination in the large particle sample stream, the counterflow virtual impactor (CVI; Ogren et al., 1985) offers the potential for contamination-free sampling of large aerosol particles. Here we present the design and calibration of a CVI intended for studying aerosol effects on cloud microphysics. Such studies require that a large and well-characterized fraction of total cloud droplet number be sampled and that the interstitial aerosol be excluded. The new CVI provides cut sizes (i.e., 50% collection efficiency diameters) down to 7 μm, which is too small for calibration with previous methods (Noone et al., 1988a). Therefore, a new calibration method has been developed which is capable of measuring both cut size and cut sharpness at small diameters. This new method, which uses a polydispersion of glass beads, represents the first set of CVI collection efficiency results for diameters well below 10 μm. The new CVI is shown to have excellent size-selectivity, comparable to other well-designed impactors, and to be well suited for number-based studies in marine stratiform clouds
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anderson et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: