Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly heterogeneous malignancy with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. A comprehensive understanding of its molecular subtypes and immune context is urgently needed to guide precision therapy. We performed an integrative analysis of transcriptomic, epigenetic, and genomic data from TCGA-LIHC and 10 external HCC cohorts. Using MOVICS-based consensus clustering and a predefined multi-algorithm survival-learning framework, we identified molecular subtypes and constructed a prognostic model (Consensus Machine Learning Signature, CMLS) based on 14 survival-associated genes. Subtype validation and immune characterization were conducted using NTP/PAM, GSVA/ssGSEA, ESTIMATE, RTN, and external immunotherapy cohorts. Two molecular subtypes (CS1 and CS2) with distinct prognostic and immune profiles were defined. CS1 exhibited an aggressive, immunosuppressive landscape characterized by T-cell exhaustion and high regulatory T-cell activity, whereas CS2 featured a more immunologically active microenvironment with enriched NK cells and M2 macrophages. Furthermore, the CMLS model effectively stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups with significant differences in survival across cohorts ( p < 0.001), with an average C-index of 0.751 across the TCGA training cohort and the two external validation cohorts. High-risk groups represented “cold” tumors with limited immune surveillance and high infiltration of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), while low-risk groups displayed “hot” tumor characteristics with robust lymphocyte infiltration and heightened immunogenicity. Notably , CDC20 was identified as a key gene with strong prognostic value and involvement in tumor progression. This study proposes a multi-omics-based molecular classification and prognostic scoring system for HCC. The CMLS model showed reproducible prognostic performance across retrospective cohorts and may provide a useful computational framework for risk stratification and hypothesis generation for future therapeutic studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: