This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Let (S=U⊕ E_8(-1)). We prove that Sakai’s eleven orthogonal modular forms are the coordinates of the inverse period map for (S)-polarized K3 surfaces. This gives a second proof of Sakai’s conjecture, first proved by Clingher, Malmendier and Williams, by a route independent of the Vinberg family. The geometric input is a general theorem: for a one-parameter Weierstrass family of elliptic K3 surfaces acquiring a single non-minimal ((4,6)) point with smooth residual fibre, the collision exponent read from the Newton polygon equals the content of the logarithm of monodromy. Applied at the one-dimensional cusp, it forces the Type II Fourier–Jacobi orders of the true coordinates, while the vanishing tori identify the double-curve modulus with (τ). Exact rational linear algebra, reproduced by an independent reconstruction with explicit integrality control, shows that the normalized 74-parameter boundary system has a unique solution, coefficientwise equal to Sakai’s. We also prove a reduced boundary criterion, classify two finite threshold certificates (222 and 252 profiles, with an exact half-space law), and determine the whole-family deformation spaces.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alberto Magno Obama Eyang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: