We analyse viscous heating in steady plane Poiseuille flow of a Gordon–Schowalter fluid between isothermal walls and determine how the convective-derivative parameter a∈ [-1,1] controls the thermal response. For β =O(1) , a regular expansion to first order in the Brinkman number Br and second order in the Weissenberg number Ws gives Θ (η )=Π f₀(η )+(1-a²)Ψ f₁(η )+O(Br²,Br\,Ws⁴) , where Π =Br\,G² , Ψ =Br\,Ws²G⁴ , and G is the dimensionless pressure gradient. Although the temperature-dependent viscosity changes the complete velocity field, Θ =O(Br) implies that this feedback first changes the temperature at O(Br²) and therefore lies beyond the retained closed form. Two structural results do not depend on this truncation. The upper- and lower-convected Maxwell limits ( a=± 1 ) have the same simple-shear law as a Newtonian fluid with the same temperature-dependent viscosity; consequently, their coupled momentum–energy problems and temperature fields coincide exactly whenever a steady solution exists. For $$|a|<1$$ , including the Johnson–Segalman and Jaumann cases, the leading viscoelastic correction is positive at fixed pressure gradient and is scaled by 1-a² . For the constant-viscosity reference, the Newtonian-connected homogeneous branch requires (1-a²)Ws²G²≤ 1 . The closed form is verified against a non-truncated prescribed-stress solution and independent second-order finite-difference and finite-volume schemes. The Maxwell–Newtonian equivalence also survives in genuine Couette–Poiseuille flow, but it is specific to steady simple-shear kinematics and need not persist when extensional rates enter the dissipation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodriguez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: