Background noise in operating nuclear power plants masks the acoustic emission (AE) signals of micro-cracks and hinders early fracture-precursor detection. A moving-window Ib-value methodology is proposed and validated by a proof-of-concept tensile test on a notched SM45C carbon steel specimen. For 651 crack signals screened by source location, the energy-based b-value (Aki's maximum likelihood method) and the Ib-value were evaluated, and detection-threshold elevation was emulated by removing up to 50% of the low-amplitude data. The cumulative approach diluted the precursor and never reached the alarm criterion of 1.0, whereas the 100-hit moving window immediately captured the shift of the crack mode from shear to tensile. Under increasing noise, low-amplitude micro-crack signals were selectively lost (survival 100% to 40%, against 100% for macro-cracks), biasing the b-value by up to −19.8%, while the Ib-value, which evaluates only the distribution's statistical center, stayed within ±4.9%. Across 0–40% hit loss it still crossed the criterion 7.4–11.8 s before rupture, at 98.4–99.3% of peak stress. The moving-window Ib-value is therefore markedly less sensitive than the b-value to the selective loss of low-amplitude AE events caused by threshold elevation. Generalization to full background-noise robustness, which also involves waveform superposition and parameter distortion, requires further validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: