Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Power and size constrained nodes in fifth generation (5G) and beyond-5G wireless networks preclude the direct deployment of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) transceivers for spatial diversity. Cooperative communication offers an effective alternative by exploiting the broadcast nature of the wireless channel, enabling geographically distributed single antenna nodes to form a virtual antenna array. This paper proposes a Lagrangian-constrained deep neural network (LC-DNN) framework for joint relay selection and power allocation in a two-hop multi-relay Amplify-and-Forward (AF) cooperative network. The LC-DNN model accepts normalised composite channel gains, incorporating channel state information (CSI) and inter-node path loss as its input feature vector and directly outputs the source transmission power and per-relay forwarding coefficients that maximise the end-to-end data rate subject to explicit power and rate constraints embedded as Lagrangian penalty terms in the loss function. A two-hidden-layer fully connected architecture (256–256 neurons, ReLU activations, sigmoid activation output) trained on 100,000 independent Rayleigh fading channel realisations achieved a test accuracy of 83.66% and final training loss of 0.0218 surpasses deeper configurations which exhibit overfitting. An optimized two-hidden-layer fully connected network is trained using independently generated Rayleigh-fading channel realizations, and its performance is evaluated under individual relay-power constraints of 50, 75, and 100 mW with an aggregate budget of 1000 mW. Under a network of 20 relays with a 100 mW per-relay power constraint, LC-DNN achieves a test accuracy of 83.5% ± 0.7%, with the per-relay power constraint satisfied in 100% of test samples. LC-DNN achieves 7.82 dB SNR gain over a prior DNN-based baseline [Guo et al., 2022] and a 0.92 dB gain over equal-power allocation, measured at the outage probability 10⁻³. Network parameter count grows only 16% as the relay count increases fourfold (M = 5 to 20), with measured inference time under 0.12 ms across this range, confirming that inference cost is dominated by the fixed hidden layer width rather than the number of relays.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeyalakshmi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: