Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research on sustainable business model innovation (SBMI) explains firm-level outcomes largely with firm-level constructs, leaving underexplored how employees contribute to business-model change. This question is especially important in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), where owner-managers often legitimate change and employees implement improvements through everyday work. This conceptual paper introduces employee pro-economic behavior: discretionary, observable employee conduct that supports the organization’s long-term economic viability through responsible resource use and work improvement while remaining consistent with its social and environmental commitments. The construct comprises two dimensions: resource efficiency behavior and improvement-oriented behavior. The framework separates behavioral activation from multilevel emergence. Resource-efficiency behaviors can accumulate until their effects become incorporated into the firm’s value logic, whereas improvement-oriented initiatives must progress through managerial recognition, evaluation, adoption, integration, and routinization. Resource constraints, external stakeholder proximity, and structural informality are theorized as double-edged conditions that facilitate one transition while constraining another. The framework clarifies when employee behavior remains operational improvement and when it acquires business-model-level consequences, and it offers testable propositions for research on employee microfoundations of SBMI in SMEs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samson Abiodun Toye (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: