Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nautical area scattering coefficient (NASC) data from small coastal acoustic surveys are strongly zero-inflated and spatially autocorrelated. We analysed 3324 integration intervals from 19 surveys in Jinhae Bay, Korea: May–September 2023 and March–September 2024–2025. Signals meeting a 38–120 kHz backscattering-strength-difference mask were treated as small pelagic fish and integrated at 38 kHz. Concurrent set-net and eDNA sampling showed a multi-species assemblage. Four predictor sets combining hydrographic, seasonal, spatial and topographic variables were compared using a two-part random forest under nested cross-validation with 1500 m spatial blocks. Zeros comprised 67.39% of observations. Hydrographic models achieved detection AUCs of 0.874–0.882 and positive-intensity log-scale R2 values of 0.325–0.330, versus 0.701 and 0.062 for topography plus month. Drop-column analysis showed that surface salinity carried the unique hydrographic signal and that surface temperature was redundant with salinity and month; topographic variables added nothing once coordinates were included. Survey identity alone reproduced the full-model AUC (0.882 versus 0.885): spatial-block performance largely reflects discrimination between surveys, not local interpolation. Leave-one-survey-out and leave-one-year-out validation fell to 0.503 ± 0.122 and 0.541 ± 0.123. Detection was more predictable than intensity, but the apparent skill is largely between-survey; the model should not predict unobserved occasions or estimate abundance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: