Validation of rapid shallow breathing index displayed by the ventilator compared to the standard technique in patients with readiness for weaning

Background Rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is the most commonly used parameter for predicting weaning outcome. Measurement of RSBI by Wright spirometer (RSBI standard ) is the standard method in routine clinical practice. Data specific to the accuracy and reliability of the RSBI value displayed by the ventilator (RSBI vent ) are scarce. Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate the association between the average value of RSBI vent at different time points and RSBI standard , and to assess the accuracy and reliability of these two RSBI measurement techniques. Methods This prospective cohort study included mechanically ventilated patients who were ready to wean. At the beginning of spontaneous breathing trial using the flow-by method, RSBI was measured by two different techniques at the same time, including: (1) Wright spirometer (breathing frequency/average tidal volume in 1 min) (RSBI standard ), and (2) the values displayed on the ventilator at 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 s (RSBI vent ). Results Forty-seven patients were enrolled. The RSBI vent value was significantly higher than the RSBI standard value for every comparison. According to Spearman’s correlation coefficient ( r ) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the average value of RSBI from 5 time points (0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 s) showed the best correlation with the standard technique ( r = 0.76 [ P < 0.001], and ICC = 0.79 [95% CI 0.61–0.88], respectively). Bland–Altman plot also showed the best agreement between RSBI standard and the RSBI vent value averaged among 5 time points (mean difference − 17.1 breaths/min/L). Conclusions We found that the ventilator significantly overestimates the RSBI value compared to the standard technique by Wright spirometer. The average RSBI vent value among 5 time points (0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 s) was found to best correlate with RSBI standard .