Key result
Watchman linked to ~27% higher ischemic stroke risk vs. DOACs despite lower mortality.
Why the study?
Little is known about the Watchman device's ischemic stroke reduction compared to newer direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Does the Watchman device reduce ischemic stroke and all-cause mortality compared to warfarin and DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=32,907)
Does the Watchman device reduce ischemic stroke and all-cause mortality compared to warfarin and DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation?
In patients with atrial fibrillation, DOACs are associated with lower ischemic stroke rates than the Watchman device, but the Watchman device is associated with lower all-cause mortality.
Watchman was associated with higher ischemic stroke but lower mortality than DOACs; leaves open net benefit pending randomized trials.
Introduction The Watchman device is approved in the US, but little is known about Watchman’s ischemic stroke reduction compared to the newer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This study explored the differences in ischemic stroke reduction between the Watchman device, warfarin, and DOAC medication.Methods Three patient cohorts, each containing 10,969 patients, were created using TriNetX. The primary and secondary endpoints were the ischemic stroke risk and all-cause mortality risk at 1 and 5 years.Results At 1 year, the Watchman device’s relative risk of ischemic stroke was 0.86 against warfarin but 1.27 against DOACs (P < 0.0001). The relative risk of ischemic stroke between the Watchman and DOACs was higher at 1 and 5 years (1.27 and 1.30, P < 0.0001). The relative risk of all-cause mortality at 1 and 5 years was 0.49 and 0.72 for the Watchman device compared to warfarin (P < 0.0001) and 0.66 and 0.92 between the Watchman and DOACs (P < 0.0001 and 0.01).Conclusion While DOACs were associated with lower ischemic stroke rates, treatment with the Watchman device was associated with lower all-cause mortality. Patients placed on the Watchman device due to DOAC contraindications may benefit from its lower all-cause mortality risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Etumuse et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=32,907). Watchman device vs. Warfarin and DOACs was evaluated on Ischemic stroke risk at 1 year (RR 1.27, p=<0.0001). The Watchman device was associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke compared to DOACs at 1 year (RR 1.27; P<0.0001), but a lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.66; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: