Actinin-4 was originally identified as an actin-binding protein associated with cell motility and cancer invasion and metastasis. However, actinin-4 forms complexes with a large number of different partner proteins and is speculated to have several distinct functions depending on its partner. The level of actinin-4 expression was found to be significantly lower in prostate cancer cells than in non-cancerous basal cells, and restoration of actinin-4 expression inhibited cell proliferation by prostate cancer cell line 22RV1. Immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry analysis revealed that actinin-4 forms native complexes with several partner proteins in 22RV1 cells, including with beta/gamma-actin, calmodulin, the clathrin heavy chain, non-muscular myosin heavy chain, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1, and Ras-GTPase-activating protein SH3 domain-binding protein. Clathrin is a coat protein that covers the internalized membrane pit that forms during early endocytosis. We found that other clathrin-related and unrelated cargo proteins, including dynamin, adaptin-delta, beta subunit of neuronal adaptin-like protein, and p47A, also interact with actinin-4. Immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that dynamin and clathrin co-localized with actinin-4 at the sites of membrane ruffling, and transfection of actinin-4 cDNA facilitated the transport of transferrin into perinuclear endosomes. Endocytosis terminates signaling evoked by cell surface receptors and regulates the recycling of receptors and ligands. We identified a panel of proteins whose expression and/or subcellular localization was regulated by actinin-4 by performing organelle fractionation and ICAT-LC-MS/MS. The decreased expression of actinin-4 protein in prostate cancer cells may cause aberrations in the intracellular trafficking of various cell surface molecules and contribute to carcinogenesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hara et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: