Key result
Multidisciplinary consultation model linked to improved therapeutic adherence and quality of life in trial participants.
Why the study?
Circulatory system diseases are leading causes of death worldwide, motivating evaluation of a multidisciplinary healthcare team approach in cardiology clinical research consultations.
Does a structured multidisciplinary consultation model improve therapeutic adherence and quality of life in patients attending clinical research consultations in Cardiology?
Cohort (n=406)
No
Does a structured multidisciplinary consultation model improve therapeutic adherence and quality of life in patients attending clinical research consultations in Cardiology?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.39% vs 0.12%
p-value: p=<0.001
A structured multidisciplinary consultation model significantly improves therapeutic adherence and quality of life in cardiovascular patients participating in clinical trials.
May support multidisciplinary models for adherence in CV trial patients; leaves open generalizability and requires RCTs before practice change.
Background and aim: Circulatory system diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, are among the leading causes of death worldwide. This study aimed at implementing a structured project to monitor patients attending clinical research consultations in Cardiology, through a multidisciplinary healthcare team. Research design and methods: A multidisciplinary consultation model was developed and implemented, comparing a control group (Group A, without intervention) and an intervention group (Group B). The study assessed five data collection moments and analysis, including sociodemographic characterization, risk factors, anthropometric assessment, therapeutic adherence (using the Measure Treatment Adherence [MTA] scale), and quality of life (assessed via the EQ Visual Analogue Scale [EQ VAS], part of the EQ-5D-5L scale). Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences), version 28.0 for Windows. Results and discussion: The anthropometric assessment showed no significant improvement, with both groups maintaining stable weight and BMI values at pre-obesity levels. The parameters remained stable over the follow-up, suggesting that the multidisciplinary intervention and consistent monitoring helped preserve these health indicators. However, significant improvements in therapeutic adherence and quality of life were observed over time in both groups. The increase in therapeutic adherence was significantly greater in Group B, t(432) = -9.046, p < .001, as was the increase in quality of life, t(435) = -5.674, p < .001. Conclusions: The study highlights the value of structured consultations, supported by a trained and professionalized multidisciplinary team, in enhancing health indicators and the quality of life of patients with cardiovascular diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pais et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease (n=406). Structured multidisciplinary consultation model (enrolled in clinical trials) vs. Standard consultation (not enrolled in clinical trials) was evaluated on Increase in therapeutic adherence (MTA scale) from baseline to 18 months (p=<0.001). A structured multidisciplinary consultation model significantly improved therapeutic adherence and quality of life over 18 months in cardiovascular patients enrolled in clinical trials compared to controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: