Occupational radiation exposure remains a concern during interventional radiology (IR) procedures. Patient-mounted shielding drapes can reduce exposure, but conventional drapes are heavy, and performance of lightweight drapes with shielding walls has not been investigated. This study developed a lightweight X-ray shielding drape with a detachable shielding wall and evaluated its radiation shielding performance under different projection angles and operator positions. A phantom study was performed using an angiography system under seven projection angles during percutaneous coronary intervention. Ambient dose equivalent was measured at four operator locations: the torso, eye lens, forward-leaning eye lens, and hand. The device consisted of a shielding drape and a detachable shielding wall, both with a lead equivalence of 0.125 mmPb and a combined weight of 938 g. Dose reduction was evaluated under four conditions: no protection, drape alone, drape with a vertical shielding wall, and drape with a forward-tilted shielding wall. The shielding wall provided protection compared with the drape alone. Dose reductions of 70–80% were achieved at the forward-leaning eye lens and hand positions. The effect varied with projection angle and was limited at the eye lens position for some LAO and CAU projections. No significant difference was observed between the vertical and forward-tilted configurations. These findings indicate that the lightweight shielding drape can provide radiation protection despite its low lead equivalence. Its detachable shielding wall may provide complementary protection at positions that are difficult to cover with conventional devices. The lightweight design may reduce the physical burden on patients during IR procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sagehashi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: