This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Carbon fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRPs) are essential for lightweighting in aerospace, automotive, and renewable energy applications, yet their projected growth beyond 280,000 t per year by 2030 generates a mounting end-of-life waste challenge. This review evaluates sustainable CFRP recycling and closed-loop reuse based on peer-reviewed literature and publicly available technical, industrial, and project information available through 30 June 2026. Mild-chemical solvolysis, hybrid thermal-chemical processes, and emerging biological routes are assessed with respect to fiber recovery, mechanical-property retention, environmental performance, economic viability, and technology maturity. Optimized processes can recover fibers retaining high tensile properties while substantially reducing the environmental burdens of virgin carbon-fiber production. The review examines interfacial modification, fiber alignment, recyclable and cleavable matrix systems, and their roles in enabling higher-value reuse across aerospace, automotive, renewable-energy, marine, and multifunctional applications. Particular attention is given to differences in feedstock characteristics, fiber grade, process conditions, system boundaries, economic assumptions, and technology-readiness assessments, which can strongly influence reported performance. Persistent barriers associated with heterogeneous waste streams, large-tow fibers, collection logistics, process scale-up, standardization, certification, and environmental trade-offs are identified. Laboratory evidence, pilot-scale demonstrations, commercial deployment, announced capacity, and forward-looking projections are explicitly distinguished. Future reclaimed-fiber adoption is discussed through scenario-based projections rather than a single deterministic forecast. An operational decision framework is proposed that links waste characteristics, matrix chemistry, recycling-route selection, recovered-fiber quality, reprocessing strategy, application requirements, and lifecycle and economic considerations, thereby supporting the transition toward more circular CFRP systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fazeli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: