A systematic study is conducted for the steam gasification of biomass materials (cellulose, Cedar, and Aspen) using temperature-programmed gasification (TPG) and constant-temperature gasification (CTG) methods in order to produce H 2 -rich gas. The performance of catalyst (CaO) was also studied by varying the catalyst loading from 0 to 8.9 wt % during TPG and CTG processes. The TPG and CTG experiments showed that the use of CaO as a catalyst reduced the maximum gasification temperature by ∼150 °C. Also, the rate of H 2 and cumulative H 2 productions were increased with the impregnation of CaO in cellulose, Cedar, and Aspen during TPG and CTG processes. In TPG, the rate of production of H 2 was increased from 0.21 to 0.38 cm 3 (STP)/min/(0.04 g of sample) when 5.5 wt % CaO was impregnated in cellulose. Higher CaO loading of 8.9 wt % did not improve H 2 production. In CTG, the rate of H 2 production and cumulative production of H 2 increased from 0.18 to 0.31 cm 3 (STP)/min and from 11 to 14 cm 3 (STP)/(0.04 g of sample) when 5.5 wt % CaO was impregnated in cellulose. The rate of production and cumulative production of H 2 from Cedar and Aspen were significantly higher than those from cellulose for catalytic as well as for noncatalytic TPG and CTG processes. Total fuel yield, H 2, and carbon yields were also significantly increased with the impregnation of CaO in cellulose, Cedar, and Aspen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dalai et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: