BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have expanded rapidly with the introduction of selective interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors, Janus kinase inhibitors, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, and several emerging therapeutic classes. Consequently, the major clinical challenge has shifted from developing effective therapies to determining how best to position them within increasingly complex treatment algorithms. AIMS: To review the contemporary and emerging therapeutic landscape in IBD, focusing on mechanism-based treatment positioning, disease modification, refractory disease, and novel therapeutic strategies that may overcome the current therapeutic ceiling. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive review of PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and major international conference proceedings to identify pivotal clinical trials, long-term extension studies, comparative effectiveness studies, real-world evidence, and emerging therapeutic developments in IBD. RESULTS: Comparative studies have strengthened the positioning of selective iL-23 inhibitors as foundational therapies in IBD, while oral small molecules continue to expand with novel mechanisms and improved convenience. Emerging strategies targeting TL1A, fibrosis and advanced combination therapy offer the potential to further improve outcomes, particularly in refractory disease. However, important challenges remain regarding optimal treatment sequencing, patient selection, long-term safety and disease modification. CONCLUSION: Contemporary IBD management is increasingly defined by mechanism-based therapeutic positioning rather than simply expanding treatment options. Ongoing advances in comparative effectiveness research, novel therapeutic targets, and treatment strategies have the potential to further individualise care and improve long-term patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Subhaharan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: