This technical research record consolidates the V₀ Disappearance Theory development from DT0–DT5R and the Kinematic Mediation Audit KMA0–KMA5. It formalizes three distinct disappearance levels (D_obs, D_link, D_real), separates strong realization transition from strong disappearance, and records a conditional architecture for an intact-body E→T→P corridor with identity preservation, typed balance, and model-relative realization obstruction. Two physical-origin routes remain open: (A) an independently warranted ordinary drive coupled to realization dynamics and (B) an independently derived compatibility/admissibility deformation law. The record retains a conditional local b-chart model with a model-derived spinodal threshold, while explicitly denying that exact support, high speed, long distance, hidden-sector transfer, instability, or controlled opposition alone constitute a transition law. The KMA audit finds no current physical witness satisfying transition dynamics, intact identity, and realization obstruction simultaneously. Accordingly, the branch remains in terminal freeze; no control→realization law or V₀-specific attribution is claimed. The document is intended as a citable theory-development and provenance record, not as empirical evidence or a verified law of nature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panasenko (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: