Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To understand the epidemiological variation in bacteremia characteristics among differently aged populations, adults with community-onset bacteremia during a 6-year period were studied in a retrospective cohort. A total of 2,349 bacteremic patients were stratified into four age categories: young adults (18 to 44 years old; 196 patients; 8.3%), adults (45 to 64 years old; 707 patients; 30.1%), the elderly (65 to 84 years old; 1,098 patients; 46.7%), and the oldest old ( ≥ 85 years old; 348 patients; 14.8%). Age-related trends in critical illness (a Pitt bacteremia score of ≥4) at bacteremia onset, antibiotic-resistant pathogens (extended-spectrum β-lactamase [ESBL]-producing Escherichia coli , Klebsiella species, and Proteus mirabilis [EKP]; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA]; and levofloxacin nonsusceptible EKP), inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy (EAT), and 4-week mortality rate were observed. Using a multivariate regression model, critical illness at bacteremia onset (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 9.03; P < 0.001) and inappropriate EAT (AOR, 2.67; P < 0.001) were the two leading predictors of 4-week mortality. Moreover, ESBL-producing EKP (AOR, 12.94; P < 0.001), MRSA (AOR, 8.66; P < 0.001), and levofloxacin-nonsusceptible EKP (AOR, 4.27; P < 0.001) were linked to inappropriate EAT. In conclusion, among adults with community onset bacteremia, significant positive age-related trends were noted in antibiotic-resistant pathogens and bacteremia severity, which were related to the increasing incidence of inappropriate EAT and 4-week mortality with age. Thus, different empirical antimicrobial regimens should be considered for distinct age groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: