This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Reliable electroencephalogram (EEG)-based emotion recognition remains challenging because labeled recordings are limited, noisy, non-stationary, and strongly subject dependent. This paper proposes a classification-aware conditional diffusion-augmented criss-cross graph transformer for raw EEG emotion recognition. Unlike generation-centered augmentation methods, the proposed framework couples EEG generation and classification through asymmetric alternating optimization. Detached multi-step synthetic samples expand the classifier training distribution, while differentiable one-step clean estimates receive feedback from a temporarily fixed classifier to improve the task relevance of the generator. The CondDiffEEG generator employs gated emotion-subject-time conditioning for subject-calibrated synthesis, while orthogonality regularization discourages linear overlap between the projected emotion and subject conditions. Temporal and frequency-domain constraints further preserve essential signal characteristics. For classification, CGODE-CCT first factorizes temporal and inter-channel dependencies through criss-cross attention, then models continuously evolving electrode interactions using a dynamically updated graph ODE, and finally refines the graph-enhanced representations for emotion prediction. Experiments on DEAP, SEED, and DREAMER under subject-independent and subject-dependent protocols demonstrate consistent improvements over conventional classifiers, EEG Transformer models, and generative augmentation baselines. Quantitative evaluation further indicates improved spectral consistency, real-synthetic distributional similarity, downstream transferability, and sample diversity. These findings demonstrate that task-oriented coordination between conditional EEG generation and continuous graph-based classification provides an effective approach to robust EEG emotion recognition.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: