This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
T-DNA tagging is a method to generate mutations in plants by random insertion. It is an important tool for the study of gene function in Arabidopsis because it allows you to see how the plant responds when expression of a specific protein is altered. T-DNAs carrying promoter elements that can cause transcriptional activation, called activation tags, have previously been shown to be effective at identifying novel genes (Tani et al. 2004). We attempted to develop a gene silencing T-DNA, by modifying the existing microRNA-induced gene silencing (MIGS) platform (Han et al. 2015). In this platform, the transgene consists of a promoter driving expression of a miR173 target sequence directly adjacent to the gene sequence to be silenced (Zhang 2014). Expression produces an mRNA which is bound by the complementary, naturally occurring Arabidopsis microRNA, miR173. This induces the production of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) which target homologous transcripts for degradation (Zhang 2014). The T-DNA transgene containing the BAR gene, a CaMV 35S promoter, and the miR173 target sequence was made by modifying the existing pMIGS vector (Han et al. 2015) (Fig. 1A). The T-DNA transgene was transformed into wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana plants using the floral dip method (Clough et al. 1998). Screening for mutant phenotypes in the offspring, we identified one plant, named Gamora, which exhibited altered leaf shape, delayed flowering, and a reduced seed set in a dominant manner (Fig. 1C). Whole genome sequencing of the Gamora mutant using Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencing (Michael et al. 2018) produced 111,593 reads with an average length of 6 kb, resulting in approximately 670 Mb of sequence. One read contained the T-DNA sequence along with adjacent Arabidopsis genome sequence, allowing us to determine where the transgene had inserted in the genome (Fig. 1B). The T-DNA is inserted upstream of KNAT1 (At4G08150), likely in the promoter region. PCR amplification (Fig. 1D) and sequencing of the transgene/genome junction site revealed that the T-DNA right border and part of the miR173 target sequence were missing, but the CaMV 35S promoter was still intact (Fig. 1B). Lacking these sequences, the T-DNA is likely to function as an activation tag because the CaMV 35S promoter has been shown to induce the expression of nearby genes (Odell et al. 1985). KNAT1 has been identified previously and is known to encode for a KN1-like homeodomain protein which is primarily localized in the shoot apical meristem in Arabidopsis (Lincoln et al. 1994). Overexpression of the maize homolog for KNAT1 (Kn1) under control of the 35S promoter in tomato resulted in dwarfed and bushy plants (Hareven et al. 1996). It has also been shown that overexpression of Kn1 and KNAT1 under control of the 35S promoter in Arabidopsis results in plants with highly lobed leaves, defects in floral development, reduced fertility, slow growth, and dominant inheritance, similar to the Gamora phenotype (Lincoln et al. 1994). Together, this suggests that the Gamora phenotype is due to overexpression of the KNAT1 gene. The results obtained from this project provide insight into the development and use of Arabidopsis gene discovery tools. Though this study identified a mutant phenotype and its underlying gene, it also suggests that there are limitations to our MIGS-based silencing tagging design. Our strategy requires that the miR173 target sequence be placed near the ends of the T-DNA, which increases the probability for loss of this sequence upon insertion. Afolabi et al. (2004) found that non-intact T-DNAs were present in over 70% of transgenic rice lines, in most cases reflecting loss of the mid to right border portion of the T-DNA. This suggests that we may have better success with integration of the miR173 target sequence if we include more sequence between the target sequence and the right border. Our study also indicates that Nanopore sequencing can be successfully utilized to identify transgene locations in Arabidopsis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moulton et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: