Key result
Early invasive coronary angiography shows no benefit over late angiography for 1-year major cardiovascular events.
Why the study?
Current guidelines recommend early invasive coronary angiography within 24 hours in NSTE-ACS patients with GRACE score over 140, but evidence is based on older trials.
Does early invasive coronary angiography improve the composite outcome of death, MI, and stroke in patients with NSTE-ACS compared to late angiography?
Cohort (n=1,767)
Does early invasive coronary angiography improve the composite outcome of death, MI, and stroke in patients with NSTE-ACS compared to late angiography?
An early invasive strategy does not appear to significantly reduce the risk of death, MI, or stroke at 1 year in NSTE-ACS patients, even those with a GRACE score >140, challenging current guideline recommendations.
AIMS: Current guidelines recommend an early (<24 h) invasive coronary angiography (ICA) strategy in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients with Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score over 140. Evidence for this recommendation is based on older trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1 February 2016 and 31 July 2021, 1767 patients with a primary diagnosis of NSTE-ACS without indication for urgent ICA underwent ICA during index hospitalization. Six hundred and fifty-five patients underwent early invasive ICA (within 24 h) and 1112 underwent late ICA (between 24 h and 1 week). One hundred and seven patients had a GRACE risk score of 140 or above and 1660 had a GRACE risk score under 140. The primary composite outcome was all-cause mortality, stroke, and recurrent myocardial infarction (MI). Median time from admission to ICA was 13.3 h (IQR 6.0-20.6) for the early group and 59.9 h for the late group (IQR 23.5-96.3). There was no difference between the early and late ICA groups in the primary composite outcome [late catheterization >24 h hazard ratio 1.196, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.969-1.475, P -value 0.096]. A multivariable Cox regression model for the composite outcome revealed no difference between the early and late ICA groups (late catheterization >24 h hazard ratio 1.0735, 95% CI 0.862-1.327, P -value 0.512) with no effect for performing early ICA in patients with GRACE score over 140 (hazard ratio 1.291, 95% CI 0.910-1.831, P -value 0.151). CONCLUSION: An early ICA strategy in patients with NSTE-ACS patients and GRACE risk score over 140, compared with late ICA, was not associated with improved composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke at 1 year.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bar et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in NSTE-ACS (n=1,767). Early invasive coronary angiography (<24 h) vs. Late invasive coronary angiography (24 h to 1 week) was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, and recurrent myocardial infarction at 1 year (HR 1.196, 95% CI 0.969-1.475, p=0.096).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: