Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The occurrence, induction, or inhibition of preferential enrichment is described for four new analogous racemic ammonium sulfonates. Racemic [2-[4-(2-hydroxy-3-phenoxypropoxy)phenylcarbamoyl]ethyl]trimethylammonium p -nitrobenzenesulfonate [(±) -1a ] showed preferential enrichment in EtOH, but the efficiency was modest. The deposited crystals were an α 1 -form or a mixture of the α 1 -form and a new μ-form, depending on the solvent used. The terminal p -fluorophenoxy analogue (±) -1b showed more efficient preferential enrichment in EtOH, followed by the exclusive deposition of the α 1 -form crystals. On the other hand, (±)-[2-[4-(2-hydroxy-3-phenoxypropoxy)phenylcarbamoyl]ethyl]trimethylammonium p -toluenesulfonate [(±) -2a ] failed to show preferential enrichment in any solvent to give the μ-form deposited crystals exclusively, whereas the terminal p -fluorophenoxy analogue (±) -2b showed very efficient preferential enrichment in EtOH, accompanied by the exclusive deposition of the α 1 -form crystals. Addition of the α 1 -form seed crystals of (±) -2b to the supersaturated EtOH solution of (±) -2a successfully induced the epitaxial transition to lead to the occurrence of preferential enrichment of (±) -2a, accompanied by the exclusive deposition of the α 1 -form crystals. From these results, it has been concluded that (i) polymorphic transition of the initially formed γ-form into the α 1 -form is essential for the occurrence of preferential enrichment of (±) -1 and (±) -2 and (ii) the direct transformation of the γ-form polymorph into the μ-form fails to show preferential enrichment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horiguchi et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: