Background: Blood volume measurements provide important clinical parameters in certain treatment situations. Method: While a fast, accurate and reliable methodology has been available to estimate the blood volume measurements for almost a decade, the availability of “normal” or “should be” blood volume measurements have not been readily available. In this article, we have provided geometric means and selected percentiles points with 95% confidence intervals for total blood volume, red cell volume, and plasma volume for children aged 8-11 years old, adolescents 12-17 years old, and adults aged 18 years and over by gender, race/ethnicity, age, and body mass index. The reference ranges are also provided. Result: We have also provided mathematical formulae that can be used to compute “should be” blood measurements for specific patients with a given gender, race/ethnicity, age, and body mass index. Conclusion: It is up to individual physicians to decide in a given treatment situation which “should be” index, e.g., geometric mean vs. median they want to use for comparison with actual estimated blood measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2016 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: