Key result
ACE DD genotype is linked to higher sudden cardiac arrest risk in coronary disease.
Why the study?
The relationship between ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism and sudden cardiac arrest in the Chinese population was unclear.
Case-Control (n=232)
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism and to understand sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in the Chinese population. METHODS: In this study, 232 patients were divided into the SCA group and the coronary disease group with coronary disease, but no SCA occurred during the treatment period. After comparing the genotype frequencies of the two groups, all patients were further divided into three groups as the II homozygotes, ID heterozygotes, and DD homozygotes to investigate the relationship in ACE I/D polymorphism and other risk factors of SCA. RESULTS: The frequencies of DD genotype in the SCA group were significantly higher than the coronary disease group, as well as the D allele frequencies in the SCA group were high when compared with the coronary disease group. According to the genotypes of the ACE I/D polymorphism, the distribution of patients' characteristics had no significant differences among all the characteristics. Both, the patients who survived SCA, with II genotype and the ones who died of SCA, with DD genotype had significant higher percentages. CONCLUSION: The DD genotype was associated with a higher prevalence of SCA and might be a risk factor of survival rate in sudden cardiac death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2018) conducted a case-control in Sudden cardiac arrest (n=232). ACE I/D polymorphism (DD genotype) vs. Coronary disease without sudden cardiac arrest was evaluated on Prevalence of sudden cardiac arrest. The DD genotype of the ACE I/D polymorphism was associated with a higher prevalence of sudden cardiac arrest and lower survival rate among Chinese patients with coronary disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: