Key result
PRAEP-GO trial evaluates cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation versus usual care in frail surgical patients.
Why the study?
Evidence on the cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation in frail elderly patients prior to elective surgery is sparse and of low quality.
This RCT will determine prehabilitation cost-effectiveness in frail elderly surgical patients; extends limited perioperative optimization evidence.
Background Prehabilitation aims to improve patients' functional capacity before surgery to reduce perioperative complications, promote recovery and decrease probability of disability. The planned economic evaluation is performed alongside a large German multi-centre pragmatic, two-arm parallel-group, randomized controlled trial on prehabilitation for frail elderly patients before elective surgery compared to standard care (PRAEP-GO RCT). The aim is to determine the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of prehabilitation for frail elderly before an elective surgery. Methods The planned health economic evaluation comprises cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, and cost-minimisation analyses. Analyses are conducted in the German context from different perspectives including the payer perspective, i.e. the statutory health insurance, the societal perspective and the health care provider perspective. Data on outcomes and costs, are collected alongside the ongoing PRAEP-GO RCT. The trial population includes frail or pre-frail patients aged ≥70 years with planned elective surgery. The intervention consists of frailty screening (Fried phenotype), a shared decision-making conference determining modality (physiotherapy and unsupervised physical exercises, nutrition counselling, etc.) and setting (inpatient, day care, outpatient etc.) of a 3-week individual multimodal prehabilitation prior to surgery. The control group receives standard preoperative care. Costs include the intervention costs, the costs of the index hospital stay for surgery, and health care resources consumed during a 12-month follow-up. Clinical effectiveness outcomes included in the economic evaluation are the level of care dependency, the degree of disability as measured by the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), quality-adjusted life years (QALY) derived from the EQ-5D-5L and the German utility set, and complications occurring during the index hospital stay. Each adopted perspective considers different types of costs and outcomes as outlined in the protocol. All analyses will feature Intention-To-Treat analysis. To explore methodological and parametric uncertainties, we will conduct probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses. Subgroup analyses will be performed as secondary analyses. Discussion The health economic evaluation will provide insights into the cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation in older frail populations, informing decision-making processes and contributing to the evidence base in this field. Potential limitation includes a highly heterogeneous trial population. Trial registration PRAEP-GO RCT: NCT04418271; economic evaluation: OSF (https://osf.io/swn79/ registration initiated on 29.06.2023).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eckhardt et al. (2023) studied Frail or pre-frail patients undergoing elective surgery (n=1,400). Prehabilitation (PRAEP-GO) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Incremental QALYs, avoidance of worsening of Level of Care-Dependency, and incremental length of stay in ICU. The PRAEP-GO trial protocol outlines a planned evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of a 3-week prehabilitation program versus usual care in frail elderly patients prior to elective surgery, with no clinical results available yet.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: