Key result
Linagliptin lowers HbA1c by ~0.6% vs placebo in T2D with microalbuminuria.
Why the study?
In T2DM patients, hypertension and microalbuminuria are predictive markers for increased renal and cardiovascular risk, but the efficacy and safety of linagliptin in this high-risk population needed evaluation.
Mean Difference: -0.59 (95% CI -0.8–-0.39)
Absolute Event Rate: -0.65% vs -0.05%
p-value: p=< 0.0001
Supports linagliptin for glycemic control in T2DM with hypertension and microalbuminuria; extends trial data to this cardiorenal subgroup.
BACKGROUND: In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension and microalbuminuria are predictive markers for increased renal and cardiovascular risk. This post hoc analysis of data from a global development program aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of linagliptin in a population with joint prevalence of these two vascular risk factors. METHODS: Data for patients with baseline microalbuminuria (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio 30-300 mg/g) and hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg and/or a history of hypertension; and/or an antihypertensive treatment at baseline) who participated in any of six randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trials were analyzed. Participants received linagliptin 5 mg daily (alone or in combination with other oral antidiabetic drugs) or placebo for 18 to 24 weeks. RESULTS: Of 3,119 patients, 512 had both microalbuminuria and hypertension (linagliptin, 366; placebo, 146). Baseline mean (SD) HbA1c was 8.3 (0.9)% and 8.4 (0.9)%; median (range) urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio was 60 (30-292) mg/g and 64 (30-298) mg/g; mean (SD) systolic blood pressure was 138 (15) mm Hg and 135 (16) mm Hg; and mean (SD) diastolic blood pressure was 81 (10) mm Hg and 81 (10) mm Hg, for linagliptin and placebo, respectively. Placebo-corrected mean change in HbA1c from baseline to week 18 and week 24 was -0.57% (95% CI: -0.75, -0.39; P < 0.0001) and -0.59% (95% CI: -0.80, -0.39; P < 0.0001), respectively. Placebo-corrected mean change in FPG from baseline to week 24 was -21.3 mg/dl (95% CI: -31.0, -11.6; P < 0.0001). The incidence of drug-related adverse events was similar for linagliptin and placebo (10.4% and 8.2%, respectively). Changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol and triglyceride levels were similar between linagliptin and placebo. CONCLUSION: In T2DM patients with the two common vascular risk factors of hypertension and microalbuminuria, linagliptin achieved significant improvements in glycemic control. In this vulnerable patient population at high risk for micro- and macrovascular complications, linagliptin was well tolerated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eynatten et al. (2013) studied Type 2 diabetes mellitus with microalbuminuria and hypertension (n=512). Linagliptin vs. Placebo was evaluated on Mean change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24 (MD -0.59%, 95% CI -0.80, -0.39, p=< 0.0001). Linagliptin significantly reduced HbA1c by a placebo-corrected mean of 0.59% at 24 weeks compared to placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and microalbuminuria.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: