Large-pore mesoporous silicas with wormhole framework structures have been assembled through hydrogen-bonding pathways from sodium silicate or tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) as the silica source and amine-terminated Jeffamine surfactants of the type H 2 NCH(CH 3 )CH 2 [OCH 2 CH(CH 3 )] x NH 2 as the structure-directing porogen. Depending on the molecular weight of the α,ω-diamine surfactant ( x ∼ 33 and 68 for Jeffamine D2000 and D4000, respectively) and the synthesis temperature (25−65 °C), the mean pore size distributions of the mesostructured silicas (denoted MSU-J) were centered between 4.9 and 14.3 nm, making these materials comparable to hexagonal SBA-15 mesostructures in average framework pore size. In addition to the BET surface areas of MSU-J silicas (408−1127 m 2 /g) being comparable to those of SBA-15 (630−1040 m 2 /g), MSU-J silicas exhibit larger pore volumes (1.37−2.29 cm 3 /g) than SBA-15 silicas (0.56−1.23 cm 3 /g) prepared in the absence of mesitylene. MSU-J wormhole mesostructures represent the largest pore sizes observed to date for a fully three-dimensional mesoporous framework assembled from a single micellar porogen. Only mesostructured micellar foam structures exhibit larger pore sizes, but the preparation of foam structures requires the use of more complex microemulsions or latex polymers as porogens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: