Background: High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is vital for pediatric survival, yet maintaining precision remains difficult even for specialists. This study evaluated the impact of real-time audiovisual feedback on pediatric CPR and identified independent factors influencing performance. Methods: This prospective study recruited 110 pediatric intensive care unit providers. Performance data were collected using an infant manikin and a defibrillator system with dual anterior–posterior sensors to eliminate mattress deflection artifacts. “On-target” quality was defined as the simultaneous achievement of American Heart Association-recommended rate (100–120/min) and depth (≥4.0 cm or one-third anterior-posterior diameter). Participants performed two 1-min sessions of compression-only CPR: A baseline session and a subsequent session with real-time visual feedback. Data were analyzed using nonparametric tests and multivariable logistic regression. Results: At baseline, performance was suboptimal (0% on-target), with female participants compressing too fast and certified providers performing significantly shallower compressions. With real-time feedback, the median rate was corrected to 110/min, and the median depth increased from 2.2 to 4.0 cm ( P < 0.001), raising the on-target rate to 49.2%. Feedback usage was the strongest independent predictor of rate adherence (adjusted odds ratios = 27.23). Notably, feedback enabled certified providers to reverse baseline trends and achieve greater depths than noncertified counterparts. Furthermore, participants with at least six real-world experiences achieved the highest on-target scores (median = 0.60). Conclusions: Real-time feedback effectively standardizes CPR quality by eliminating gender and training recency gaps. While it ensures a critical performance baseline, extensive clinical experience remains essential for achieving peak resuscitation quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: