Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two noniterative approximations are presented for saturated pseudoadiabats (also known as moist adiabats). One approximation determines which moist adiabat passes through a point of known pressure and temperature, such as through the lifting condensation level on a skew T or tephigram. The other approximation determines the air temperature at any pressure along a known moist adiabat, such as the final temperature of a rising cloudy air parcel. The method used to create these statistical regressions is a relatively new variant of genetic programming called gene-expression programming. The correlation coefficient between the resulting noniterative approximations and the iterated data such as plotted on thermodynamic diagrams is over 99.97%. The mean absolute error is 0.28°C, and the root mean square error is 0.44 within a thermodynamic domain bounded by −30° < θw ≤ 40°C, P > 20 kPa, and −60° ≤ T ≤ 40°C, where θw, P, and T are wet-bulb potential temperature, pressure, and air temperature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bakhshaii et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: