This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This paper presents a data-driven framework for verifying static state-feedback stabilisers for control-affine nonlinear systems using a Koopman-lifted behavioural representation. The state is embedded into a finite-dimensional observable space, and one-step lifted data matrices are constructed from persistently exciting exploratory trajectories collected under an auxiliary pre-stabilising feedback. To reduce the conservatism associated with global-fit residual bias, a two-stage protocol is introduced. In Stage (i), the exploratory lifted data are used to construct a behavioural representation of a candidate closed loop via the Koopman-lifted extension of Willems’ fundamental lemma, to screen candidate feedback gains. In Stage (ii), dedicated near-equilibrium closed-loop perturbation data are used to identify a local closed-loop Jacobian, from which a quadratic Lyapunov function is computed via a discrete Lyapunov equation. Under the local embedding and residual assumptions, this lifted Lyapunov function induces a local Riemannian contraction metric on the underlying nonlinear manifold. Building on this construction, the paper develops two complementary certificates: a deterministic local Region-of-Attraction inner bound, together with Local Input-to-State Stability margins against unmodelled dynamics, obtained from a local residual bound; and a scenario-certified probabilistic one-step Lyapunov decrease set obtained using the Scenario Approach applied directly to the nonlinear closed-loop dynamics. The framework is validated on an inverted-pendulum benchmark and shown to be competitive with strong baseline controllers while additionally providing explicit stability certificates grounded in measured trajectory data.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tushar Jain (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: