Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is increasingly understood through the lens of large-scale brain connectivity, yet most computational approaches fail to capture the dynamic, subject-specific neural interactions that define it. Recent graph neural network (GNN) methods have incorporated adaptive graph formulations. The existing approaches typically update edge weights via a single attention-reweighting pass per layer, without recursive feedback between updated edges and node representations, and rely on linear amplitude-based connectivity measures that may miss the non-linear phase synchrony abnormalities characteristic of ASD. We present the Adaptive Edge–Node Interaction Network (AENIN), a graph learning framework in which node representations and functional edges co-evolve through an iterative feedback mechanism, enabling connectivity to emerge from the data. Subject-specific brain graphs are constructed via Adaptive Phase-Synchronisation (APS), a method designed to extract temporally sensitive inter-regional dynamics from resting-state fMRI. In addition, a clinically interpretable Supportive Clinical Reporting Module (SCRM) proposed here bridges learned graph representations and clinical insight by quantifying functional connectivity patterns through three metrics: the Critical Influence Score (CIS), the Interaction Topology Score (ITS), and the Path Connectivity Score (PCS). The model evaluated on 800 participants from the ABIDE I dataset, AENIN achieves 0.8275 ± 0.0457 accuracy and 0.8304 ± 0.0462 F1-score. The neurobiological analysis reveals atypical hyperconnectivity in sensorimotor and occipital regions in ASD, corroborating findings in the existing literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uday et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: