An evaluation of the accuracy of atmospheric and marine satellite-derived products is presented and discussed for the northern Adriatic Sea coastal region using match-ups of in situ and Sea-Viewing Wide-Field-of-View Sensor (SeaWiFS) data for the period September 1997-September 2001. The study, making use of a simple atmospheric correction scheme including a near-infrared (NIR) turbid-water correction, has shown mean relative percentage differences between in situ and satellite-derived aerosol optical thickness lower than 23% in the spectral range between 443 and 865 nm. By applying regional empirical bio-optical algorithms for chlorophyll a concentration (Chla), total suspended matter concentration (TSM), and diffuse attenuation coefficient at 490 nm (K/sub d/(490)), match-ups analysis has shown mean relative percentage differences of 40% for Chla, 28% for TSM, and 30% for K/sub d/(490). The analysis is supported by comparison of in situ and satellite-derived normalized water leaving radiances to highlight the importance of the NIR turbid-water correction and to discuss the intrinsic uncertainties due to the use of empirical algorithms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mélin et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: