Key result
Hybrid UNet 3+-Transformer model achieves ~91% Dice accuracy for left ventricle segmentation.
Why the study?
Accurate left ventricle segmentation of cardiac MR images remains challenging due to large differences in cardiac structures among subjects and blurred LV edge information.
May enhance automated LV segmentation accuracy; leaves open prospective clinical validation before routine use.
Left ventricle (LV) segmentation of cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) images is essential for evaluating cardiac function parameters and diagnosing cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Accurate LV segmentation remains a challenge because of the large differences in cardiac structures in different research subjects. In this work, a network based on an encoder–decoder architecture for automatic LV segmentation of short-axis cardiac MR images is proposed. It combines UNet 3+ and Transformer to jointly predict the segmentation masks and signed distance maps (SDM). UNet 3+ can extract coarse-grained semantics and fine-grained details from full scales, while a Transformer is used to extract global features from cardiac MR images. It solves the problem of low segmentation accuracy caused by blurred LV edge information. Meanwhile, the SDM provides a shape-aware representation for segmentation. The performance of the proposed network is validated on the 2018 MICCAI Left Ventricle Segmentation Challenge dataset. The five-fold cross-validation evaluation was performed on 145 clinical subjects, and the average dice metric, Jaccard coefficient, accuracy, and positive predictive value reached 0.908, 0.834, 0.979, and 0.903, respectively, showing a better performance than that of other mainstream ones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2022) studied Left ventricle segmentation (n=145). Network combining UNet 3+ and Transformer vs. Other mainstream networks was evaluated on Average dice metric. A network combining UNet 3+ and Transformer for left ventricle segmentation achieved an average dice metric of 0.908, Jaccard coefficient of 0.834, and accuracy of 0.979 on 145 clinical subjects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: