To address the replication crisis and instill confidence in the scientific literature, we introduce a new framework for evaluating scientific manuscripts. “Peer replication” would be an alternative or augmentation to peer review and elevate peer-replicable works to a higher tier of publication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lord et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: