Key result
Functional risk stratification categorizes athletes with congenital heart disease into three subgroups for competitive sports participation.
Why the study?
Few guidelines exist to help physicians decide on safe and advisable sports participation for individuals with congenital heart disease and arrhythmias.
Few guidelines exist for sports in congenital heart disease; leaves open evidence-based risk stratification for competitive participation.
Advances in the diagnosis and early management of congenital heart disease in recent decades have led to increasing numbers of individuals being sufficiently well to participate in social as well as truly competitive sports. Physicians are increasingly asked whether such participation is safe, advisable, and efficacious, yet few guidelines exist to help them make these decisions. There are three apparent subgroups of patients: (a) those with mild or repaired problems, who function normally or nearly so and may fully participate; (b) those with severe functional deficit or known high risk, for whom strenuous exertion must be strictly proscribed; and (c) those who fall in between, with some limitations and some risk--these patients present a great challenge to the wisdom and clinical skill of the physician.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard R. Liberthson (1999) conducted a review in Congenital heart disease. Athletes with congenital heart disease can be categorized into three subgroups based on functional deficit and risk to guide safe participation in competitive sports.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: