Key result
McConnell sign fails to differentiate pulmonary embolism from right ventricular infarction.
Why the study?
The clinical utility of the McConnell sign in diagnosing acute right ventricular dysfunction due to pulmonary embolism or right ventricular infarction was uncertain.
Observational (n=161)
Blinded to diagnosis
Absolute Event Rate: 70% vs 67%
p-value: p=0.657
Caution against relying on McConnell sign to differentiate pulmonary embolism from right ventricular infarction; leaves open need for more specific echocardiographic markers.
BACKGROUND: A normally contracting right ventricular apex associated to a severe hypokinesia of the mid-free wall ('McConnell sign') has been considered a distinct echocardiographic pattern of acute pulmonary embolism. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical utility of the 'McConnell sign' in the bedside diagnostic work-up of patients presenting to the Emergency Department with an acute right ventricular dysfunction due to pulmonary embolism or right ventricular infarction. DESIGN: Among 201 patients, consecutively selected from our clinical database and diagnosed as having massive or submassive pulmonary embolism or right ventricular infarction, 161 were suitable for an echocardiographic review of regional right ventricular contraction and were included in the study. There were 107 cases with pulmonary embolism (group 1) and 54 cases with right ventricular infarction (group 2). All echocardiographic studies were randomly examined by two experienced and independent echocardiographers, blinded to the patient diagnosis and without Doppler informations. RESULTS: The McConnell sign was detected in 75 of 107 patients in group 1 (70%) and in 36 of 54 patients in group 2 (67%); the finding was absent in 32 cases in group 1 and in 18 cases in group 2 (P=0.657). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the McConnell sign for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism were respectively 70, 33, 67 and 36%. CONCLUSIONS: In a clinical setting of patients with acute right ventricular dysfunction the McConnell sign cannot be considered a specific marker of pulmonary embolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Casazza et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Acute right ventricular dysfunction due to pulmonary embolism or right ventricular infarction (n=161). Pulmonary embolism vs. Right ventricular infarction was evaluated on Presence of the McConnell sign (p=0.657). The McConnell sign was detected in 70% of patients with pulmonary embolism and 67% with right ventricular infarction (P=0.657), demonstrating it is not a specific marker for pulmonary embolism.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: