Key result
Bosentan may improve pulmonary hemodynamics and functional capacity in portopulmonary hypertension.
Why the study?
Endothelin peptides and their receptors are implicated in the pathophysiology of portopulmonary hypertension, but therapeutic potential of endothelin receptor antagonism requires further clinical evaluation.
Portopulmonary hypertension (PPHT) is a rare but devastating complication in patients with portal hypertension, characterized by pulmonary arterial obliterative disease with a concomitant rise in pulmonary vascular resistance. A broad body of evidence has accumulated, indicating that endothelin (ET) peptides and their cognate receptors are causally involved in the pathophysiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) owing to different aetiologies, including PPHT. In addition, the ET system may be involved in hepatic fibrotic remodelling and portal hypertension. Several experimental models have provided evidence that ET receptor antagonism may have therapeutic potential in PPHT. Initial experience has accumulated during the last 2 years, suggesting that targeting the ET system may have beneficial effects in the clinical setting. In these studies, the orally active, dual ET receptor antagonist bosentan improved pulmonary haemodynamics and functional capacity. These effects were sustained and occurred in the absence of adverse events. If these observations can be corroborated by controlled clinical trials, bosentan would offer several advantages over available therapies, which have major drawbacks owing to their invasive and demanding mode of application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neuhofer et al. (2006) conducted a review in Portopulmonary hypertension. Bosentan (endothelin receptor antagonist) was evaluated. Initial clinical experience suggests that the dual endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan may improve pulmonary haemodynamics and functional capacity in patients with portopulmonary hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: