Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INTRODUCTION: Artificial intelligence (AI) is being increasingly incorporated into implant dentistry for diagnostic assessment, treatment planning, and clinical decision support. However, its growing clinical application raises concerns regarding patient privacy, informed consent, transparency, accountability, and professional responsibility. The present study aimed to assess dentists' perceptions of the ethical and legal challenges associated with AI-assisted implant dentistry and evaluate their relationship with AI knowledge and professional characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dental professionals participated in this cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey from March to August 2022. A validated survey was employed to evaluate professional and demographic traits, AI expertise, and ethical and legal attitudes. The 10 ethical and legal assertions were graded on a 5-point Likert scale, and the 10-item AI knowledge part was scored from 0 to 10, for a total score of 0-40. Cronbach's α = 0.86 indicated that the questionnaire had acceptable internal consistency. Descriptive statistics, multiple linear regression, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Pearson's correlation were used to examine the data; p < 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance. The predicted ethical and legal concern scores progressively decreased from 31.2 in the low knowledge group to 27.4 in the moderate knowledge group and 23.5 in the high knowledge group. CONCLUSION: Greater AI knowledge and previous exposure were associated with fewer ethical and legal concerns regarding AI-assisted implant dentistry. Structured AI education, appropriate regulatory frameworks, data protection, and clear professional accountability are essential for integrating AI into implant practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sindhuja et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: