Key result
Influenza A can trigger septic cardiomyopathy mimicking fulminant myocarditis with preserved cardiac output.
Why the study?
Distinguishing between fulminant myocarditis and septic cardiomyopathy in influenza-associated shock is clinically important due to differing features and treatments.
Case Report (n=1)
May warrant influenza testing in refractory shock mimicking myocarditis; leaves open septic cardiomyopathy prevalence in viral infections.
CASE: Fulminant myocarditis (FM) and septic cardiomyopathy (SC) are two different disease entities, and distinction between them is important. A 34-year-old man had refractory shock, multiple organ failure, and elevation of cardiogenic markers. Echocardiogram showed tachycardia with extended ST elevation, and a rapid test for influenza A virus was positive. He was admitted with suspected FM induced by influenza. OUTCOME: Echocardiography showed severe left ventricular dysfunction and dilatation, but no myocardial edema. Inconsistent with FM, a right heart catheter examination showed preserved cardiac output. Therefore, SC was considered and standard therapy for septic shock was initiated. He was stabilized in the first 72 h without mechanical circulatory support. CONCLUSION: Influenza A infection can cause septic shock accompanied by SC. This condition is confusing in the clinical appearance of FM. However, SC shows critically different features of FM, and it might not occur in the epidemic period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzuki et al. (2019) conducted a case report in Influenza-associated septic shock accompanied by septic cardiomyopathy (n=1). Standard therapy for septic shock (fluid resuscitation, vasopressors, CRRT, peramivir) was evaluated on Clinical recovery and stabilization. Influenza A infection can cause septic shock accompanied by septic cardiomyopathy, which mimics fulminant myocarditis but features preserved cardiac output and can occur outside the epidemic period.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: