Key result
Higher hospital and operator volumes are linked to improved quality of care in CV procedures.
Why the study?
The impact of hospital and operator volume on quality of care in cardiovascular procedures is documented for some interventions but less consistent for acute myocardial infarction treatment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hospital volume and often also operator volume have documented impacts on the quality of care for aortic and aortocoronary bypass surgery, for percutaneous angioplasty and for radiofrequency ablation for arrhythmias, whereas data are less consistent for treatment of acute myocardial infarction. A review of this research is given. In the Nordic countries hospitals are small, and often the plateau of the learning curve cannot be reached. To discourage low-volume centers from embarking upon too complicated interventional or surgical procedures, the author suggests that a minimal number should be set for certain major procedures, both for hospitals and for physicians.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knut Gjesdal (1998) conducted a review in Cardiovascular procedures. Hospital and operator volume was evaluated on Quality of care. Higher hospital and operator volumes have documented impacts on improving the quality of care for major cardiovascular procedures, suggesting a need for minimum volume requirements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: