Key result
Cardiac rehabilitation improves exercise capacity, symptoms, and myocardial perfusion in symptomatic non-obstructive CAD.
Why the study?
Treatment for angina in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease is empiric and 30% remain symptomatic despite therapy, with limited data on effects of physical exercise.
Systematic Review (n=218)
Supports cardiac rehabilitation referral in symptomatic non-obstructive CAD; extends Level 1 evidence beyond obstructive disease populations.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) on coronary angiography is a common finding in patients with stable angina. Angina in NOCAD patients is thought to be caused by endothelial dysfunction of the epicardial coronary arteries and/or the microvasculature. Treatment is empiric, and 30% of patients remain symptomatic in spite of therapy. It is well known that physical exercise can improve endothelial function. The goal of this review was to assess the current literature on effects of physical exercise in NOCAD patients with angina. Therefore, a literature search was conducted to March 13, 2018 using the following search terms: syndrome X, microvascular angina, non-obstructive coronary artery disease and exercise training, cardiac rehabilitation, endothelial function. All original publications were included which examined the effect of a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program or exercise training (ET) on patients with angina and NOCAD. RECENT FINDINGS: Eight studies, of which four were randomized controlled studies, examined 218 participants, 162 in an intervention and 56 in control groups. Most patients were women (97.7%). Exercise programs varied from 8 weeks to 4 months at moderate intensity and some included relaxation therapy. The studies examined the effect of CR on exercise capacity, quality of life (QoL), and perfusion defects. CR increased exercise capacity, oxygen uptake, symptom severity, and QoL. Myocardial perfusion improved. CR appears to be beneficial in symptomatic patients with NOCAD, improving exercise capacity and QoL and reducing severity of symptoms and myocardial perfusion defects. Data is limited to a small number of predominantly female patients. Further larger trials are warranted to determine the optimal rehabilitation protocols and define its long-term benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kissel et al. (2018) conducted a systematic review in Non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) with angina (n=218). Cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training vs. Control (no intervention, symptom monitoring, or relaxation therapy alone) was evaluated on Exercise capacity, quality of life, and myocardial perfusion. Cardiac rehabilitation improved exercise capacity, quality of life, symptom severity, and myocardial perfusion in symptomatic patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: