Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To define the age-related prevalence of incidental soft-tissue findings in cervical CT scans of a trauma population and to investigate their clinical importance. METHODS: The original diagnostic radiology reports and the CT images of the 357 patients with cervical trauma were retrospectively evaluated. Incidental soft-tissue findings were investigated. All findings were grouped according to age. The findings were classified based on their clinical importance into three categories: Category 1: no clinical importance, Category 2: possible clinical importance requiring further investigation and Category 3: obvious clinical importance. In addition, the medical records of the patients were investigated. The follow-up ratio of the pathologies mentioned in the original radiology report was recorded. RESULTS: The most frequently encountered findings in Categories 2 and 3 were carotid artery calcification (n = 89, 24.9%) and tonsillolith (n = 115, 32.2%), respectively. The reporting ratio in the original reports of Categories 1, 2 and 3 findings was 1.1% (n = 4), 9% (n = 27) and 34.5% (n = 64), respectively. No further investigations and follow-up was accomplished for Category 1 lesions, whereas 11.1% of Category 2 and 35.9% of Category 3 lesions were subjected to further investigations and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The cervical CT scans of trauma patients reveal many clinically important soft-tissue incidental findings. Cervical region incidental findings may be followed up on an outpatient basis, rarely being of life-threatening value. The ratio of reporting and follow-up of incidental findings increases parallel to the clinical importance of the lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ergün et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: