A new mathematical tool is best known by playing with it. The D function, DA(s)=∑ₙ(aₙ₊₁-aₙ)\,aₙ⁻ˢ, was introduced to read the staircase of the primes. Here we apply it to things far beyond its purpose, and listen to what it says. A sequence that swings ever more violently, 1,-1,2,-2,…, turns out to have the Riemann zeta function as its D function, while the alternating squares give an entire function built from Dirichlet's eta. The orbit of $27$ under the Collatz map keeps a ledger of its rises and falls in $D(1)$; Recamán's sequence advances at a steady pace beneath its swings; and Kolakoski's sequence, whose balance of ones and twos is an open problem since 1965, can be restated as a property of its D function, which the data confirm to seven decimal places. The gaps of the primes return towards their typical size more strongly than their own shuffle; the digits of ρ and η, mirror images of each other, speak with different voices but share the same continued fraction. Turned towards its own family, the D function finds that the zeros of the zeta function repel each other while the primes cluster, and that the pole of the zeta function is inherited by its second generation. A stumble along the way, an equation that was not there, reminds us that almost is not exact. Everything here is meant to be looked at rather than proved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel Avilés Hurtado (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: